Comments on: Times New Roman http://www.prepressure.com Prepress, printing, PDF, PostScript, Fonts and stuff... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:14:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Susanne http://www.prepressure.com/fonts/interesting/times#comment-100480 Susanne Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:58:05 +0000 http://www.prepressure.com/?page_id=709#comment-100480 great help to me! great help to me!

]]> By: Susanne http://www.prepressure.com/fonts/interesting/times#comment-100479 Susanne Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:57:30 +0000 http://www.prepressure.com/?page_id=709#comment-100479 of great help to me! of great help to me!

]]> By: Dave http://www.prepressure.com/fonts/interesting/times#comment-63954 Dave Sun, 10 Oct 2010 04:15:37 +0000 http://www.prepressure.com/?page_id=709#comment-63954 Serif fonts in general have low readability for on-screen copy, but good readability for print. The opposite is true for sans-serifs. Serif fonts in general have low readability for on-screen copy, but good readability for print. The opposite is true for sans-serifs.

]]> By: bill parker http://www.prepressure.com/fonts/interesting/times#comment-60121 bill parker Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:13:55 +0000 http://www.prepressure.com/?page_id=709#comment-60121 You say: "Times New Roman is not very suitable for on-screen" usage". Why? You say:

“Times New Roman is not very suitable for on-screen” usage”. Why?

]]>